翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ County of Razès
・ County of Regenstein
・ County of Ribagorza
・ County of Rieneck
・ County of Rietberg
・ County of Ripon
・ County of Riverside v. McLaughlin
・ County of Rochedale
・ County of Rodez
・ County of Rodney, Victoria
・ County of Rouen
・ County of Roussillon
・ County of Saarwerden
・ County of Sacramento v. Lewis
・ County of Saint-Pol
County of Santa Clara v. California First Amendment Coalition
・ County of Santa Fiora
・ County of Sargans
・ County of Savoy
・ County of Schaumburg
・ County of Sicily
・ County of Solander
・ County of Sponheim
・ County of St. Paul No. 19
・ County of Stanley, Queensland
・ County of Stettler No. 6
・ County of Stolberg
・ County of Talbot, Victoria
・ County of Tambo, Victoria
・ County of Tanjil


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

County of Santa Clara v. California First Amendment Coalition : ウィキペディア英語版
County of Santa Clara v. California First Amendment Coalition

''County of Santa Clara v. California First Amendment Coalition'', , was a case before the California Courts of Appeal dealing with the ability of a local California agency to limit the disclosure of, or require license agreements for, public records and data requested under the California Public Records Act (CPRA).
The court found that as public records, there was "no statutory basis either for copyrighting () or for conditioning its release on a licensing agreement" under United States copyright law because state freedom of information laws preclude a state agency’s reliance on federal copyright unless state law specifically permits it.〔 ((archived copy ) at archive.org)〕
== History ==
The case dealt with a public records request by the California First Amendment Coalition for GIS "basemap" data held by Santa Clara County, California. The trial court concluded that the county must release the records and could not place any restrictions on their use. The county then appealed to the California Courts of Appeal, which upheld the lower court's decision, and published its opinion. The county also unsuccessfully attempted to have the opinion depublished by the Supreme Court of California.
The county made three arguments. The county claimed the records were "protected critical infrastructure information" and exempted from release by the federal Critical Infrastructure Information Act of 2002, that disclosure was exempted under the CPRA under the "catch all" exemption, and that it had a federal copyright in the basemap, arguing that copyright protection authorized the county to condition release of records, under freedom of information laws like the CPRA, with restrictions on the requester’s use of the records or sharing of the records with others.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「County of Santa Clara v. California First Amendment Coalition」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.